In Understanding Genesis, Nahum Sarna argues that a critical distinction between Genesis and the stories of contemporary pagan societies is that Genesis is not myth. Myth is associated with ritual. The story happened once upon a time, but continues to influence the world. Thus, rituals re-enact the myth as “imitative magic,” reactivating the events of the myth, effecting “the periodic renewal and revitalization of nature and so [assuring] the prosperity of the community.” (7)
That is not part of Genesis.
Genesis simply takes the existence of God for granted. There…
Subscriber Content
Get Full Access Today
Interested in viewing our resources? Try our 7-day free trial.